The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) for years has been rightfully scrutinized for its lack of quality control and unhealthy options for the school lunches they provide.
The purpose of the program is to assist public, non-profit private and residential child care institutions with providing nutritionally balanced, low-cost or free lunches to children each school day. After its enactment in 1946 it was President Harry Truman who stated that the intention of the NSLP is to “safeguard the health and well-being of the Nation’s children and to encourage the domestic consumption of nutritious agricultural commodities and other foods.”
The NSLP is beneficial for a variety of reasons:
- Reduces food insecurity
Children are guaranteed 1 to 2 meals at school each day. With adequate calories per meal, children are more likely to be well fed, especially if they come from a low income household.
- Better Education
The term “brain food” is real when it comes to eating well enough to pay attention better. School meals provide the basic nutritional needs for children to focus and succeed in school.
- Motivates student well-being
Based on a study published by the Journal of School Health in 2008 it was found that effective school nutrition programs “have the potential to improve student’s diet quality, academic performance, and, over the long term, their health.”
However, over the past 76 years many school districts, administrators, teachers, parents and students have voiced their concerns that shows the NSLP has not been rightfully upholding the values they claim to be about.
Today’s common school meals can be described as junk food and below standard: frozen pizza, tater tots, corn dogs, pre-fried chicken nuggets, jello, cake slices, sugary milks, canned or old vegetables and other products that more than likely came from a bag or pre-packaged.
There may be one or 2 salad options or a very small selection of fresh fruit and vegetables but it does not come close to outweighing all the other unhealthy options that are served.
Not to mention how costly school lunches have become – have you ever heard of school lunch debt? As crazy as it may sound, children actually have debts to pay just for school meals if they receive a meal from their school that they couldn’t afford. Children having a debt for not being able to afford a substandard school lunch, up to $3.50 in some states, should be completely unacceptable.
Why is quality an issue for school lunches? What causes these problems with the NSLP? The answer lies mostly within funding.
As of 2020, the NSLP spent about $14.1 billion on school lunches, approximately $1.30 per student. This tight budgeting directly brings into question what can/will be bought and how much it will all cost, influencing the corner cutting when it comes to food quality. That $1.30 per child has to cover food cost, labor, electricity and cafeteira equipment. Presumably, if schools received more money, then schools could afford healthier options.
There is also USDA’s involvement by spending millions on agricultural products to provide to schools with little to no cost. Overer 64% of the NSLP’s budget goes towards meat, dairy and egg products, more than likely from factory farms versus locally sourced. Aside from agricultural goods, businesses or vendors the USDA purchases from are not of the healthy type. For example, the USDA spends tens of millions on subsidies for the Special Milk Program to provide and encourage milk consumption amongst children. According to them, sugary chocolate, strawberry or vanilla milks are totally fine and paid for by the government. Other vendors that the USDA employs for certain foods, snacks and other packaged goods do not hold children’s best interest in mind by providing easy, cheap and unhealthy products given to schools without much of a second thought on the impact or who is disportionately receiving these lower quality goods.
This is especially true for low-income schools and school districts who either receive most if not all funding from the NSLP. The school then has very little purchasing power and can only afford to take what is provided.
With over 95% of all schools and nearly 30 million children in America participating in the NSLP, poor quality meals become more than an issue of giving unfavorable meals to children, but contests other public health factors.
What effects do these meals have on the development of children over time? How does this contribute to the childhood obesity crisis? How does this food affect their mood, focus or thinking? Is the NSLP properly fulfilling their goal?
Why food quality matters:
- Paves the way to healthier eating habits
Eating habits are developed young in life. If children are taught to enjoy healthier food by being exposed to them at a younger age, it can influence healthier resting habits as adults. Especially since children eat at schools at least 5 days a week so they will have plenty of opportunities to familiarize themselves with different foods.
- Results in better academic performance
It is well known that being undernourished or hungry leads to a hard time focusing and retaining information. It can also decrease our motivation to work or complete tasks. Students who have a well-rounded meal are more likely to stay focused and do better academically.
- Improves classroom behavior and attitude towards learning
A 2008 Harvard study found that providing less processed foods or foods with chemical additives resulted in less aggressive and irritated behaviors in students. Also that subsidized, healthy foods resulted in a 6% increase of students choosing healthier options at school.
- Reduces obesity and improves overall health
As of 2019, almost 20% of adolescents are obese in America which is estimated to rise to about 60% in most states by 2030. A JAMA Pediatrics study conducted in 2013 showed that students who were given precise, nutritional meals had lower rates of obesity than other schools.
According to the USDA, school meals are supposed to include a bread product at least 50% whole grain, foods with zero trans fat, fruits and vegetables must be served every day, green/leafy vegetables must be served once a week, meals must meet both minimum and maximum calorie requirements for certain age groups and both regular and flavored milk must be nonfat or 1 percent.
These guidelines were a part of the 2010 Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act (HHFKA) which was launched to address school lunch quality and America’s increasing childhood obesity issue by revamping the prior federal guidelines. The intention was to improve school meal standards by introducing healthier meals, healthier choices and to provide more nutritious meals for students to further benefit their overall well-being in school.
The guideline changes affected all schools that receive funding from the USDA and funding is only approved if the guidelines are followed. Thus creating the incentive that as long as the very basic guidelines are met, meal funding would be received. There seems to be very little quality control over these meals since the enactment of HHFKA. Despite following guidelines, holes in its structure allows for cheap and unhealthy main courses continue to be the norm.
Pizza, for example, is high in salt, fat and hidden sugars yet is fine to serve simply because there is an apple accompanied with it. Or another example, fried chicken with canned veggies instead of fresh vegetables meets guideline requirements as “nutritionally acceptable” for children. Meals will vary in what is served but the standard remains that unhealthier options are preferred since they are more favorable, cheaper and last longer than healthier options. This is especially true for low-income schools with larger free and reduced lunch programs.
Since the HHFKA, school meals have seen little change in incentive and quality. Most meals are not made by the schools and there is still an overwhelming lack of fresh fruits and vegetables. Also, due to certain criticism such as too strict guidelines, food costs and the calorie insufficiency of these meals, federal administrations have been scaling back the reformed school nutrition requirements which could lead to and maintain less nutritious foods in many schools.
One prominent change that is building traction in schools is either providing or creating plant-based meals in schools. Improving school meals with plant-based options has the potential of providing much more healthier options in school and to set a new standard for what foods are acceptable for children. Unprocessed, plant-based meals can be full of fiber, vitamins and enough calories to give students the proper brain food they need to perform better in school. Plant-based meals could also be a catalyst to addressing our nation’s increasing childhood obesity and illness rates. Children who follow a plant-based diet are less at risk for chronic illnesses such as diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure, certain cancers, etc.
With plant-based lunches, schools are hoping to make healthy eating more appealing, affordable and accessible to all children. Also, with there being so much evidence that daily school meals alone make such an impact on a students well-being both in and outside of the classroom, imagine that greater, positive impact that healthier, plant-based options could bring – it isn’t as far-fetched as it may seem.
In 2012, the USDA approved plant-based proteins such as nut and seed butters, cooked beans and peas, soy protein, veggie burgers and even tofu to meet the USDA requirements for alternative protein products. Unlike milk or other foods, these alternatives are not subsidized and can be expensive for districts to pay for themselves. There is also the issue of plant-based diets and knowledge is still relatively unknown to many so the demand for plant-based alternatives is not high enough. However, there is a strong incentive that plant-based meals will do everything the NSLP are supposed to be doing simply with fresh ingredients and by relying on local farmers to do so.
Luckily, there are there are currently 5 school districts in America that have begun implementing plant-based meals into their school districts:
1. Los Angeles Unified School District, California
In 2017, LAUSD piloted offering vegan meals in 40 of the schools in their district. They now provide vegan options in 82 schools and counting. From impossible burgers to vegan three-bean chili, the district is dedicated to offering fresh and yummy meals and rotate out their options every 4 months.
2. Ithaca City School District, New York
Since 2010, ICSD’s Coalition for Healthy School Food has been evolving their tactics to incorporate healthier options in their schools. With the intention of introducing new foods and fun, healthy eating to students, the non-profit has blended education on health foods, different cultures and taste-testing to show student eating better can be truly. delicious and nutritious. They offer one plant-based entrée at least twice a week in all 13 of the district’s schools as well as a salad bar with plans to expand their options in the future!
3. Plainfield Community Consolidated School District 202, Illinois
Previously, PCCSD offered vegetarian and plant-based options by request. Now, with the help of the food service provider Aramark, they are offering these options to all students from salad bars to vegan chicken nuggets and many more delicious options to come!
4. Santa Barbara Unified School District, California
SBUSD serves about 2 million meals a day, about half of which are vegan! They strongly encourage plant-based eating and even serve at least one option each day throughout all their schools – sometimes the meatless options sell more than the others. Along with their community gardens and veg-education on healthy eating, they are a true, leading example of what the future of plant-based inclusion in school can look like.
5. Portland Public Schools, Maine
PPS have served vegetarian options in their schools for years, but recently they wanted to revamp their proclaimed “boring” plant-based meals into flavorful, exciting ones. The then single, cold vegetarian option is now 4 hot vegan meals served in some elementary, middle and high schools in the district.
HOW TO GET INVOLVED
LEARN ABOUT PEELED, OUR BRAND NEW TV SHOW: VKind is making VEGAN HISTORY by introducing the first and only 100% vegan cooking competition TV show! Be sure to visit our new Peeled website for the latest news, contests, giveaways, and raffles and to get VIP tickets to our Worldwide Premiere on Sept. 24th, 2022! Our exclusive red carpet premiere event will be held in the prestigious Directors Guild of America Theater in Hollywood, CA. Visit PeeledShow.Com now to learn more!
CONTESTS & GIVEAWAYS: Be the first to hear about our latest Giveaways, Contests, and Raffles by following us on Instagram where all of our giveaways are featured.
WATCH & LEARN: We have so much exciting content on our YouTube channel with some amazing new shows! Subscribe to our YouTube channel for our latest shows, live events, interviews, videos, news, secret giveaway contests & more!
GET FEATURED: We would love to publish & promote your delicious vegan recipes on our App, websites, and social media channels. Submit your recipes here!
ADD YOUR LISTING: Are you ready to attract customers and clients hyped on your values and what you offer? We’re all about opening up more possibilities to support small to medium-sized vegan businesses, professionals, and companies, like YOU. Add your listing now!
SUBSCRIBE FOR THE LATEST NEWS: Get exclusive access to the latest vegan businesses, events, and plant-based news hot off the press. Subscribe to our Newsletter.